Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Failure to Maintain Complete Medical Records for Suprapubic Catheter Care

Baltimore, Maryland Survey Completed on 10-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards for two residents with suprapubic catheters (SPC). For one resident with a history of benign prostatic hyperplasia and urinary retention, the facility was unable to provide medical health information to the hospital emergency room staff upon transfer. Review of the resident's records showed inconsistent documentation of SPC changes, with the last recorded change in December, and no documentation of changes from January through May, despite care plan and urology consult recommendations for routine exchanges every 4-6 weeks. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that there was no documentation available to support that the SPC was changed during this period and indicated that different urology providers had varying communication methods, which contributed to the lack of documentation. For another resident with obstructive and reflux uropathy and an overactive bladder, the facility's records also lacked documentation of SPC changes as ordered. The resident had an order for SPC changes every four weeks, which was later changed to 'as needed.' However, there was no documentation in the Treatment Administration Records (TARs) of any SPC changes from January through July, despite ongoing urology consult notes recommending routine exchanges every 4-6 weeks. The DON was unable to provide documentation to confirm that the SPC was changed as recommended during this time frame. Interviews with facility staff and urology consultants revealed that while providers may have performed SPC changes during consultation visits, these were not consistently documented in the residents' medical records. The lack of documentation meant that the facility could not demonstrate compliance with physician orders or care plan interventions regarding SPC management for the affected residents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙