Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
D

Failure to Follow Wound Care Provider Recommendations for Pressure Ulcer Treatment

Bethesda, Maryland Survey Completed on 10-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to provide appropriate wound care for a resident with a Stage 3 pressure ulcer in the sacral area. The wound care provider made specific recommendations for wound treatment, including the use of Collagen and later Dakins solution with fluffed gauze, zinc oxide paste, and transparent film, to be applied twice daily. However, these recommendations were not entered into the resident's treatment orders or the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). Instead, the facility ordered a different treatment regimen, including cleansing with normal saline instead of Dakins solution and applying the treatment only once daily on certain days, which did not match the wound care provider's instructions. Further review revealed that wound care was not documented as completed for several days, and when it was documented, it was not done according to the recommended frequency. Interviews with the DON and the Unit Manager confirmed that the wound care provider's recommendations were not followed and that the orders in the TAR differed from those recommendations. The resident's wound worsened from Stage 3 to Stage 4, and the wound care provider ultimately recommended hospital transfer for further management.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙