Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0607
E

Failure to Implement Abuse Prevention and Reporting Policies

Salisbury, Maryland Survey Completed on 10-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement its abuse prohibition and prevention policies for multiple residents, as evidenced by the lack of proper reporting and incomplete investigations into allegations of abuse, neglect, and injuries of unknown origin. In several cases, allegations made by residents or their representatives were not reported to required external agencies such as law enforcement and the ombudsman, despite facility policy mandating such notifications. For example, allegations involving rough care, physical abuse, and neglect were not communicated to the appropriate authorities, and documentation showed that notifications were either delayed or not made at all. Investigations into reported incidents were incomplete and did not follow facility policy. In multiple instances, investigation reports lacked statements from the residents who made the allegations, the staff members involved, and potential witnesses. For example, in one case, a resident alleged rough care by a GNA, but the investigation file did not include statements from the resident or the staff present during the incident. Similarly, another resident alleged that a housekeeper pushed them, but the investigation lacked statements from both the resident and the housekeeper, and there was no evidence that other residents or staff were interviewed as required by policy. Interviews with facility leadership confirmed that the expected procedures for thorough investigations and reporting were not followed. The Regional Director of Operations and the Regional Nurse Consultant acknowledged that interviews with all involved parties and timely notifications to external agencies were part of facility protocol, yet these steps were not consistently documented or performed. Additionally, review of initial reports for several other residents revealed that allegations of verbal abuse and injuries of unknown origin were not reported to required agencies, further demonstrating a pattern of noncompliance with abuse prevention and reporting policies.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙