Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Failure to Provide Dignified Care and Respect Resident Privacy

Salisbury, Maryland Survey Completed on 10-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to treat three residents with dignity and respect as required by policy. One resident, who had a history of hemiplegia, hemiparesis, chronic heart failure, and chronic pain, was dependent on staff for toileting and hygiene. On the day of the incident, the resident experienced incontinence while preparing to attend church and requested assistance with hygiene. Staff informed the resident that if incontinence care was provided, the resident would not be able to attend church, leading the resident to attend the service in a soiled brief. The Manager on Duty was not informed of the incident until after lunch, and incontinence care had still not been provided by early afternoon. Multiple interviews confirmed that the resident and their representative reported the incident, and staff acknowledged the failure to provide timely care. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure privacy and dignity for two other residents sharing a room. During an observation, a staff member entered the shared room without knocking or announcing herself, despite the facility's policy requiring staff to knock and request permission before entering any resident's room. The staff member believed that knocking was unnecessary if the door was open, a misunderstanding not supported by facility leadership or policy. Interviews with facility leadership confirmed that the expectation was for staff to always knock or announce themselves before entering, regardless of whether the door was open. These incidents demonstrate that staff did not follow established policies designed to protect resident dignity, including prompt response to requests for incontinence care and respecting privacy by knocking before entering resident rooms. The failures were confirmed through interviews with residents, their representatives, and facility staff, as well as review of facility policies and grievance documentation.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙