Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Inaccurate Documentation of Resident's Treatment Administration Record for Heel Protector Boots

Havre De Grace, Maryland Survey Completed on 11-07-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of a resident's Treatment Administration Records (TAR) regarding the use of heel protector boots. During the investigation, it was found that although the resident's TAR indicated that the boots were applied during all shifts from 5/14/25 to 5/18/25, progress notes from multiple staff members documented that the boots were missing and could not be located. Staff notes included reports from both nursing staff and the attending physician, who noted the resident's requests for the boots and the need to order replacements, indicating the boots were not available as required by the physician's order. The discrepancy was confirmed during a review of the records with the Director of Nursing, who acknowledged that the TAR documentation did not match the progress notes. The resident had an active order for heel protector boots to be worn at all times except during bathing, but the documentation failed to accurately reflect the resident's actual care and the absence of the boots during the specified period.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙