Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Timely Update and Document Resident's Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences

Havre De Grace, Maryland Survey Completed on 11-07-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to update and accurately document a resident's wishes regarding life-sustaining treatment and did not assess the resident's decision-making capacity in a timely manner. The resident, who was their own responsible party, had a Maryland MOLST form indicating a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) order, but subsequent documentation by staff indicated the resident expressed a desire to attempt CPR and was alert and oriented at that time. Despite this, the MOLST was not updated to reflect the resident's clarified wishes, and there were discrepancies between the resident's expressed preferences and the orders documented in the medical record. Further review revealed that after the resident experienced changes in condition and was transferred to and from the hospital, staff expressed discomfort discussing code status and requested a re-evaluation of the resident's capacity. However, no timely capacity evaluation was completed, and the medical records remained unclear about who the decision maker was during this period. Both the DON and the social worker confirmed these discrepancies and the lack of timely assessment, resulting in unclear and inconsistent documentation of the resident's life-sustaining treatment preferences.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙