Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Use Assistive Device During Resident Transfer

Huntington, Indiana Survey Completed on 09-19-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Staff failed to follow facility policy regarding the use of assistive devices during the transfer of a physically dependent resident diagnosed with Parkinson's disease, muscle weakness, tremors, and difficulty walking. The resident was documented as cognitively intact but had upper and lower extremity impairment on one side and required extensive assistance from two staff members for transfers. The care plan specified that transfers required two staff and that a mechanical lift could be used as needed. However, during observed transfers, two CNAs moved the resident between a recliner and bed without using a gait belt or any assistive device, instead lifting the resident by placing their arms under the resident's armpits and cueing the resident to move his feet. Both CNAs acknowledged during interviews that they should have used a gait belt for the transfer, and this was confirmed by an RN and the DON, who stated that a gait belt was required for this resident during transfers. The facility's policy on safe lifting and movement of residents required staff to incorporate resident safety and to be trained in the use of manual and mechanical lifting devices. The failure to use a gait belt or assistive device during the transfer was directly observed and confirmed by staff interviews, constituting a failure to implement the facility's policy for safe resident transfers.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙