Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Document and Implement Interventions After Resident Falls

Sullivan, Indiana Survey Completed on 09-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure proper documentation and implementation of interventions following falls for two residents with significant cognitive impairments and fall risks. For one resident with moderate dementia, diabetes, and atrial fibrillation, multiple falls occurred over a period of several months. The medical record lacked timely documentation of these falls, including missing fall assessments, skin and pain assessments, and progress notes detailing the circumstances of the incidents. In several instances, there was a delay of several days before any interdisciplinary team (IDT) notes were entered, and there was no evidence that new interventions were added to the care plan after repeated falls. Additionally, family notification was not documented for at least one fall. For another resident with Alzheimer's disease and a cognitive communication deficit, an unwitnessed fall was not properly documented in the progress notes, and the change in condition evaluation did not include details about the fall or any interventions to prevent recurrence. The only documentation of the fall was found in a risk management incident report, which was not part of the resident's official medical record and was not visible to all staff. The IDT note, completed several days after the fall, mentioned the resident's shoes were too big and that a new pair would be obtained, but there was no documentation of immediate interventions or assessments in the medical record. Interviews with the LPN and DON revealed that staff were expected to complete fall assessments, skin and pain assessments, and notify the DON, physician, and family immediately after a fall. However, the DON was unaware that the fall risk management assessment and risk management incident reports were not part of the official medical record and not accessible to all staff. The facility's own falls protocol required detailed assessment and documentation after a fall, but this was not consistently followed for the residents reviewed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙