Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
E

Failure to Maintain Resident Dignity, Timely Care, and Privacy

Indianapolis, Indiana Survey Completed on 11-07-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Multiple residents experienced a lack of dignity and respect due to staff actions and inactions, as evidenced by resident council meeting notes, direct observations, and interviews. Residents reported that staff would enter rooms, turn off call lights without providing the requested care, and leave without returning, resulting in residents waiting one to two hours for assistance. Staff were also described as speaking disrespectfully, being rude, and using earbuds or phones while providing care. Additionally, staff were overheard discussing residents' personal care needs loudly in hallways, including using residents' names and making derogatory comments about care tasks they did not want to perform. These issues were reported to occur more frequently during evening, night, and weekend shifts. Direct observations confirmed that call lights for two residents remained unanswered for extended periods, with one resident waiting approximately 30 minutes before staff entered the room and another waiting nearly two hours to be cleaned up. One resident was found with his pants down and without a privacy curtain available, indicating a lack of bodily privacy. Another resident reported waiting an hour and a half after her call light was answered before being assisted to bed, resulting in discomfort. Staff were observed engaging in personal conversations and not prioritizing resident care needs, while some staff were unaware of residents' care requirements during their assigned shifts. Resident council meeting minutes from several dates documented ongoing concerns about untimely call light responses, staff being distracted by phones and earbuds, and unkind or disrespectful behavior. Residents also reported that their concerns had been brought to management but remained unresolved. Facility policies reviewed by surveyors emphasized the importance of dignity, respect, privacy, and timely assistance, but these standards were not consistently upheld for the residents involved.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙