Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Call Light Not Accessible for Dependent Resident

East Moline, Illinois Survey Completed on 09-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a resident, who was unable to move her left side due to a cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and required substantial assistance for bed mobility, did not have her call light within reach while in bed. The resident reported that a CNA entered her room at night, took her call light away, and told her she was using it too much. Observations confirmed that the call light was placed on the nightstand, out of the resident's reach, and staff interviews corroborated that the resident could not have moved the call light herself due to her physical limitations. Staff interviews further revealed that the resident frequently used her call light for assistance, particularly at night, and facility policy required that the call light be accessible and secured for residents. The care plan for the resident specifically indicated the need to encourage her to use the call bell for assistance, given her self-care deficits. Despite these requirements, the call light was not accessible, resulting in a failure to accommodate the resident's needs and preferences as required.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙