Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Implement Fall Prevention Interventions for At-Risk Residents

Chicago, Illinois Survey Completed on 09-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Surveyors observed that the facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions for two residents identified as being at risk for falls. Both residents were found in their beds, which were not in the lowest position, despite care plans and staff interviews indicating that the beds should be kept low to reduce the risk of injury from falls. One resident was observed with a fall mat next to the bed, and both residents required assistance to get out of bed. Staff, including an LPN and a CNA, confirmed that the beds should have been in the lowest position as a fall precaution, but this intervention was not in place at the time of observation. Both residents had medical histories that included dementia and previous falls, and their care plans specifically identified them as fall risks, requiring interventions such as keeping the bed in the lowest position. Facility policy also required individualized fall prevention measures based on resident assessments. Despite these documented needs and policies, the required interventions were not consistently implemented, as evidenced by direct observation and staff interviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙