Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0692
D

Failure to Monitor and Manage Nutritional Status and Weight Changes

Watseka, Illinois Survey Completed on 08-26-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure adequate nutritional management for two residents identified as nutritionally high-risk. One resident with a diagnosis of protein-calorie malnutrition experienced significant weight loss over a six-week period, with documentation showing a 5.8% decrease in body weight. Despite physician orders for weekly weights, fortified ice cream, and nutritional shakes three times daily, the resident's records lacked documentation of weekly weights on two occasions, and meal intake records showed poor consumption on 22 occasions. Observations revealed that nutritional supplements were not consistently provided with meals, and when they were, staff did not encourage consumption or inform the resident about the supplement. Additionally, there was no documentation that the dietitian was alerted to the resident's poor intake, as required by the care plan. Another resident, who was on hospice care and had a history of significant weight loss, was not reweighed after a documented significant weight gain, as required by facility policy. The resident's weight increased dramatically between two recorded dates, but there was no evidence of weekly weights or follow-up actions in the medical record. Staff interviews confirmed awareness of the policy to reweigh residents in case of discrepancies, but this was not carried out or documented. The facility's policies on significant weight changes and obtaining accurate weights were not followed for these residents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙