Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Assist Residents with Advance Directive Formulation

Nampa, Idaho Survey Completed on 11-19-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that residents and their representatives received assistance to exercise their right to formulate an Advance Directive. For three residents reviewed, documentation showed that while each had a POST (Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment) form on file, there was no evidence that information about Advance Directives was provided or that discussions regarding Advance Directives took place as required. In each case, the admission documentation indicated the resident did not wish to create an Advance Directive at that time, but there was no follow-up or further documentation regarding their wishes or any subsequent discussion. Staff interviews revealed that social services staff misunderstood the difference between a POST and an Advance Directive, believing them to be the same. As a result, they did not follow up with the residents or their representatives about formulating an Advance Directive, nor did they document any such discussions. This lack of action and documentation was consistent across the three residents, each of whom had significant medical conditions such as stroke, diabetes, chronic respiratory failure, chronic pain, cerebral infarction, and dementia.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙