Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Follow PICC Line Care Protocols and Placement Verification

Snellville, Georgia Survey Completed on 09-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to follow its own policy and physician's orders regarding the care and management of a resident's Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line. The facility's policy required weekly dressing changes for transparent dressings and dressing changes every 48 hours for gauze dressings, or as ordered by the physician. However, the resident reported that the PICC line dressing had not been changed since insertion, and observations confirmed that the dressing was not dated or timed, and included gauze under a transparent dressing. Staff interviews revealed inconsistent practices regarding dressing changes and a lack of adherence to established protocols. Additionally, after the PICC line was reinserted, a chest x-ray to confirm placement was not ordered or performed, despite this being a standard requirement and expectation communicated by the PICC line insertion company. The resident's medical record did not contain documentation of a chest x-ray following the new PICC line insertion, and the line was used for intravenous therapy without confirmation of proper placement. Interviews with staff, including the DON and ADON, confirmed that the chest x-ray was not completed and that the line had been used daily since insertion. During an observed dressing change, further deviations from protocol were noted, including a break in sterile technique, failure to change the stabilization device and antibacterial disk, and incomplete use of enhanced barrier precautions. The resident had a history of infection, recent surgical procedures, and required IV antibiotics via the PICC line. The facility's failure to follow established protocols and physician orders for PICC line care, dressing changes, and placement verification led to the identified deficiency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙