Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Implement and Communicate Comprehensive Care Plans

Saint Cloud, Florida Survey Completed on 11-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans for two residents with severe cognitive impairment and significant care needs. For one resident with vascular dementia, diabetes, end stage renal disease, and other conditions, the care plan required two-person assistance for transfers and activities of daily living (ADLs) due to her fragility and risk of injury. Despite this, multiple CNAs admitted to providing care alone, contrary to the care plan, and could not recall if they had assistance on the day the resident was found with a bruise on her face. The care plan interventions were not consistently followed, and staff could not provide a reason for not adhering to the two-person assistance requirement. Another resident with congestive heart failure, colon cancer, Alzheimer's disease, and dementia was also dependent on staff for ADLs and at risk for skin breakdown and bruising due to fragile skin and combative behaviors. The care plan for this resident was inconsistent with the MDS assessment, listing one-person assistance for transfers and ADLs despite the assessment indicating a need for two or more staff. Staff reported difficulty accessing or understanding the electronic care plan system, often relying on verbal reports rather than documented care plans to determine the level of assistance required. Interviews with CNAs and facility leadership revealed that staff were not consistently able to access or interpret care plan information in the electronic system, leading to confusion and inconsistent care. The facility's own policy required comprehensive, person-centered care plans with measurable objectives and timetables, but these were not effectively implemented or communicated to staff, resulting in care that did not meet the documented needs of the residents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙