Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0609
D

Failure to Report Elopement Incident and Lack of Supervision

Bradenton, Florida Survey Completed on 09-11-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with a history of encephalopathy, generalized anxiety disorder, mild cognitive impairment, and alcohol use was identified as being at risk for elopement, as documented in their care plan and supported by multiple assessments indicating moderate cognitive impairment and wandering behaviors. The resident had an electronic wander bracelet in place and was subject to interventions such as a leave of absence (LOA) with escort and daily monitoring of the wander device. Despite these measures, the resident exited the facility without following the proper sign-out process, after another resident requested the door be opened by a CNA. The wander guard alarm was triggered but staff did not respond, and it was unclear who silenced the alarm. The resident was found outside the facility by law enforcement and returned unharmed. The incident was not documented in the facility's abuse/neglect log or incident and accident reports for the relevant period. Interviews with staff revealed that the CNA who opened the door did not see the resident leave and did not hear the alarm. Other staff members reported that the resident had exhibited exit-seeking behaviors earlier in the day, and this information had been communicated to nursing staff. The resident's care plan and assessments consistently identified elopement risk, and interventions were in place, but the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and response to the alarm system. Despite the resident's known risk factors and the occurrence of an unauthorized exit, the facility did not report the incident as required. The Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing stated that they did not consider the event reportable, as they believed the resident was alert, oriented, and not in harm's way. However, the facility's own policies define neglect as the failure to provide necessary services to avoid harm, and require reporting of such incidents. The lack of documentation and reporting of the elopement constituted a failure to comply with regulatory requirements for timely reporting of suspected neglect.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙