Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0699
G

Failure to Update Care Plan and Document Trauma-Informed Interventions After Adverse Event

Dunedin, Florida Survey Completed on 10-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with a history of significant trauma, including kidnapping, sexual assault, and multiple family suicides, was admitted to the facility with diagnoses such as PTSD, bipolar disorder, and anxiety. The resident was cognitively intact and had documented triggers, including loud noises and a need for control and choices in her care. Despite these documented needs, the care plan did not include the resident's preference for female caregivers only, even though this preference was relevant to her trauma history. On a specific date, the resident experienced an adverse event when she required assistance with personal care and requested a female staff member. She was informed by a male CNA that a female staff member was unavailable and would not be able to assist her for several hours. The resident, uncomfortable with a male caregiver, ultimately received care from the male CNA, during which she reported feeling re-traumatized due to the manner in which care was provided. She later disclosed the incident to a nurse, who reported it according to facility policy. Subsequent review of the resident's care plan, electronic medical record, and nurse aide Kardex revealed no documentation of her preference for female caregivers or avoidance of male caregivers, despite her trauma history and the recent incident. Interviews with staff indicated a lack of awareness regarding the resident's PTSD triggers and care preferences, particularly among float staff who were not regularly assigned to her care. The facility's trauma-informed care policy required identification of trauma history and triggers, as well as the development of individualized care plans and interventions, but these were not fully implemented for this resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙