Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Honor Resident's Bathing Preference

Torrance, California Survey Completed on 09-10-2025

Penalty

Fine: $26,685
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to honor a resident's expressed preference for showers over bed baths. The resident, who was admitted following a left leg below-the-knee amputation and required assistance with activities of daily living, was documented as being able to make reasonable and consistent decisions. The Minimum Data Set indicated that it was very important for the resident to choose between a bed bath or a shower. However, documentation showed that during a specified period, the resident received only two showers, refused a bath six times, and had fifteen shifts with no documentation of bathing care provided. The resident reported that, despite requesting showers, he was often given bed baths instead, and sometimes refused care when staff insisted on a bed bath. After a COVID-19 diagnosis, the resident refused a shower due to not feeling well, but also stated that his requests for showers were not accommodated during his recovery. Interviews with staff confirmed that the resident was particular about his care, especially regarding showers, and that residents should be able to make decisions about their care. Facility leadership acknowledged the importance of honoring resident preferences to ensure comfort and satisfaction. The facility's policy on dignity and quality of life emphasized providing care in a manner that respects resident rights and preferences, but this was not consistently followed in the resident's case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙