Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0627
D

Failure to Provide Proper Notice and Discharge Planning for Resident Transfer

Los Angeles, California Survey Completed on 09-26-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the Notice of Proposed Transfer and Discharge form was properly completed and provided to a resident or their family representative prior to discharge to a lower level of care. Specifically, the notice was not signed by the resident or their representative, did not indicate the reason for discharge, and was not provided before the discharge occurred. The resident in question had diagnoses including Parkinsonism, dementia, and epilepsy, and was noted to be confused and lacking the mental capacity to make medical decisions. Despite this, the notice indicated the resident was self-responsible and capable of verbalizing needs. The facility's Social Service Director (SSD) did not contact the resident's family member as documented, and only left a message after the discharge had already taken place. Additionally, the discharge planning process did not include a tour or offer of a tour of the receiving facility to the resident or their family, and the family was not included in the interdisciplinary meeting or discharge planning. The receiving facility was not a board and care home and required residents to care for themselves, which was not communicated to the family prior to discharge. The facility's policy and procedure required that the notice be provided to the resident or representative prior to discharge, which was not followed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙