Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0806
D

Failure to Honor Resident Food Preferences During Meal Service

Reseda, California Survey Completed on 09-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide meals that accommodated the food preferences of two residents, as identified through observation, interview, and record review. One resident, who was readmitted with diagnoses including toxic encephalopathy, sepsis, and pneumonia, had a severely impaired cognitive status and required substantial assistance with eating. The resident's dietary profile indicated a preference for mashed potatoes at lunch and dinner, and this preference was noted on the meal ticket. However, during a lunch observation, the resident was not served mashed potatoes as indicated, and the Assistant Dietary Supervisor confirmed the omission. Another resident, admitted with encephalopathy, dysphagia, and Alzheimer's disease, also had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance with eating. This resident's dietary profile specified a preference for coffee with all meals, and the meal ticket for lunch included coffee. During observation, the resident's lunch tray did not include coffee, and both the resident and staff confirmed the omission during interviews. The Director of Nursing and Registered Dietician both acknowledged the importance of following meal tickets and resident preferences to ensure adequate nutritional intake. A review of the facility's policies indicated that the dietary department is responsible for providing meals consistent with residents' preferences as documented on tray cards and that therapeutic diets should align with the resident's goals and preferences. Despite these policies, the facility did not follow the documented preferences for the two residents, resulting in the identified deficiencies.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙