Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Accurately Assess, Investigate, and Monitor Resident After Fall

Los Angeles, California Survey Completed on 09-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with a history of Parkinson's Disease, muscle weakness, dementia, and previous falls was not provided with adequate care and services to prevent accidents. The resident's fall risk assessment was found to be incomplete and inaccurate, as it only marked the age category and failed to account for significant risk factors such as vision impairment, cognitive deficits, use of antihypertensive medication, unsteady gait, and altered awareness. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that these omissions placed the resident at a high risk for falls. Additionally, the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) did not accurately reflect the level of assistance required for activities of daily living (ADLs), as therapy certifications indicated the need for moderate to contact guard assistance, while the MDS documented independence in these activities. The facility also failed to conduct a thorough investigation following the resident's fall. The investigation did not include an interview with the resident's roommate, who had witnessed the fall and could provide critical details about the incident. The DON admitted to forgetting to interview the roommate, which was contrary to facility policy requiring clarification of fall circumstances and evaluation of events leading up to the fall. Furthermore, the resident's care plan was not resident-centered and lacked specific, individualized interventions to address the resident's risk for decline in ADLs and falls, as required by facility policy. There were additional lapses in monitoring and documentation after the suspected fall. The responsible party reported the fall to both the LVN and the DON, but the LVN did not initiate further assessment or monitoring because the resident denied the fall. Progress notes revealed gaps in monitoring and documentation across several shifts following the incident, despite facility policies mandating ongoing monitoring and documentation of residents after a fall. These deficiencies in assessment, investigation, care planning, and post-fall monitoring contributed to the failure to ensure a safe environment and adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙