Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0552
D

Failure to Honor Responsible Party's Request for Podiatry Services

Long Beach, California Survey Completed on 09-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to honor a responsible party's request to remove a resident from the podiatrist patient list. The resident, who had dementia and severely impaired cognition, was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. The responsible party had communicated the request to remove the resident from the podiatry list to both the Social Services Director (SSD) and the Director of Nursing (DON) during an Interdisciplinary Team meeting and through direct communication. The SSD acknowledged receiving the request in August, while the responsible party stated the request was initially made in January. Despite these communications, the resident was seen by the podiatrist after the removal request had been made. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of coordination between the social services department and the podiatrist's office regarding which residents were to be seen. The DON confirmed that the request to remove the resident from the podiatry list was overlooked and that proper coordination should have occurred when the request was first made. Review of facility policy indicated that residents have the right to be informed of and participate in their care planning and treatment, which was not upheld in this instance.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙