Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Provide Adequate Supervision and Person-Centered Care Planning for High-Risk Resident

Anaheim, California Survey Completed on 09-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the care plan accurately reflected the individual care needs of a resident with a history of dementia, high risk for elopement, and high risk for falls. Despite documented assessments indicating the resident's severe cognitive impairment, exit-seeking behavior, and frequent wandering, the care plan did not include timely or adequate interventions to address these risks. The care plan interventions for elopement and falls were only developed after the resident experienced a fall, rather than proactively based on the resident's known behaviors and risks. On the day of the incident, the resident was observed to be unsupervised in the facility's patio, where they sustained a fall resulting in injuries that required transfer to an acute care hospital. Interviews with nursing staff and facility leadership confirmed that the resident's whereabouts were not adequately monitored, and staff were unable to account for the resident's location prior to the fall. The facility's policies required an environment free from accident hazards and person-centered care planning, but these were not followed for this resident, leading to the incident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙