Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0627
D

Failure to Re-Admit Resident Despite Bed Availability

Long Beach, California Survey Completed on 11-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to re-admit a resident after the resident was cleared for return by a Long-Term Acute Care (LTAC) hospital. The resident, who had been living at the facility for two years and had diagnoses including anoxic brain injury, chronic respiratory failure, and atrial fibrillation, was transferred to a General Acute Care Hospital for generalized body swelling. After treatment, the LTAC facility issued a discharge order for the resident to return. Despite communication from the LTAC case manager to the facility's admission coordinator, the resident was not re-admitted, with the initial explanation being a lack of available beds. However, facility census records reviewed with the Director of Nursing and Administrator showed that there were open female beds available on multiple dates following the discharge order. Interviews with facility staff, including the Director of Business Development and the Administrator, revealed uncertainty and lack of clear communication regarding why the resident was not re-admitted despite bed availability. The facility's own bed hold policy indicated that the resident should have been offered the first available bed upon return, but this did not occur, and staff could not provide a reason for the failure to re-admit.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙