Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
G

Failure to Follow Advance Directives Due to Code Status Documentation Errors

Litchfield Park, Arizona Survey Completed on 10-28-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident's advance directives were accurately followed, resulting in a discrepancy regarding the resident's code status at the time of a critical event. The resident was admitted with multiple diagnoses, including muscle weakness, MRSA, acute abscess, delirium, atrial fibrillation, dementia, and mood disturbances. Documentation in the clinical record was inconsistent: while the hospital history and some admission documents indicated a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) and Do Not Intubate (DNI) status, other records, including a signed advance directive and physician orders, indicated a full code status. The care plan did not specify a code status, and there was no evidence that the code status was clarified with the resident, their power of attorney, or the physician. Shift reports and staff recollections further conflicted, with some indicating DNR and others full code. On the day of the incident, the resident was found unresponsive in bed. Staff interviews revealed that upon discovery, the CNA called for a nurse, and two nurses responded. One nurse checked the resident's vital signs, while another checked the chart for code status and reported the resident as DNR. As a result, CPR was not initiated. There was no documentation in the clinical record that CPR was started, and the facility's self-report confirmed that CPR was not performed when the resident was found unresponsive and without signs of life. The staff relied on conflicting information from shift reports and the physical chart, leading to the decision not to initiate resuscitation. Interviews with nursing staff and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the expectation was to verify code status in the physical chart and follow the documented orders. However, the DON acknowledged a breakdown in communication and misreading of the resident's code status. Facility policy required clear documentation and communication of advance directives, but this was not consistently implemented, resulting in the failure to honor the resident's documented wishes regarding resuscitation.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙