Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Prevent Elopement Due to Inadequate Assessment and Supervision

Tucson, Arizona Survey Completed on 09-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to ensure adequate assessment, monitoring, and supervision to prevent elopement for a resident with multiple medical conditions, including moderate cognitive impairment. Upon admission, the resident was not initially assessed as being at risk for elopement, despite having a BIMS score of 4 and exhibiting wandering behavior. The resident was later identified as at risk for elopement after a reassessment, and interventions such as inclusion in the Elopement book and 15-minute checks were implemented. However, there was inconsistency in the risk assessments and care plan updates, as a subsequent assessment overrode the high-risk status without proper reflection in the care plan. The resident was able to exit the facility through the front door after 4 PM, reportedly with the assistance of the receptionist, despite being on 15-minute checks and listed in the Elopement book. At the time, two facility entrances were locked after 4 PM, while the others required a security code, but there were no Wander Guards or security cameras in place. Staff interviews revealed that monitoring relied primarily on 15-minute checks and staff awareness, with no electronic monitoring devices used for residents at risk of elopement. The facility's policy required the environment to remain as free of accident hazards as possible and for residents to receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. Despite these policies, the resident was able to leave the facility unsupervised, and staff acknowledged that adequate protection was not provided after the resident's elopement risk was identified.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙