Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0610
D

Failure to Immediately Restrict Staff Access Following Abuse Allegation

Yuma, Arizona Survey Completed on 10-07-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement its policy regarding the immediate restriction of staff access to residents following an allegation of abuse. A resident with severe cognitive impairment, multiple comorbidities including COPD, dementia, depression, and CHF, and who was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living, made an allegation of sexual abuse against a staff member. The allegation was reported to the LPN and subsequently to the DON, who instructed that the accused staff member be removed from the resident's assignment and reassigned to another hall, rather than being immediately suspended and sent home as required by facility policy. Despite the policy requiring immediate suspension of the alleged perpetrator to prevent further interaction with the resident, the staff member continued to work the remainder of the shift on a different hall, which still allowed potential access to the resident. Multiple interviews with facility staff, including the Staff Coordinator, Social Services Director, and the DON's proxy, confirmed that the expectation was for immediate suspension and removal from the premises, which did not occur. Documentation showed that the staff member was not suspended until the following morning, several hours after the initial allegation was reported. The resident expressed feeling safer after learning that the staff member was no longer employed at the facility and reported previous pain during peri-care provided by the accused staff member. The facility's own policies on abuse prevention and resident rights were not followed, as the alleged perpetrator was not immediately removed from the facility, thereby placing the resident at continued risk during the investigation period.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙