Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0835
D

Assistant Administrator Not Duly Appointed by Governing Board

Tucson, Arizona Survey Completed on 09-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the assistant administrator was duly appointed by the governing board, as required by regulation. Review of the assistant administrator's personnel file showed a job description signed by the individual but lacking CEO approval, and a handwritten HR approval signed by the same individual. The resume did not document any licenses or certifications, and the staff list, business card, and facility documentation all identified the individual as the assistant administrator. A letter designated the assistant administrator as the responsible party in the administrator's absence, but there was no evidence of a formal appointment by the governing board. The administrator confirmed there was no policy for assistant administrator appointment and was unaware of the requirement for board appointment. Interviews with staff revealed that incidents of abuse were reported to the assistant administrator, who, along with the ADON, instructed staff to let the incident go and not escalate it, particularly as it involved residents in the behavioral unit. Despite continued reports of verbal abuse and intimidation, there was no evidence of a thorough investigation or reporting to the state agency. Staff interviews confirmed the assistant administrator's role in handling such incidents, but the lack of proper appointment and oversight contributed to the deficient practice.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙