Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0756
D

Failure to Ensure Proper Physician Participation and PRN Psychotropic Medication Review

Port Saint Lucie, Florida Survey Completed on 06-19-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a licensed pharmacist performed comprehensive monthly drug regimen reviews with proper physician participation and documentation for several months. Specifically, for three out of six months reviewed, there was no clear evidence that physicians had reviewed, approved, or denied the pharmacist's recommendations. The documentation forms used were inconsistent, with missing or unclear columns for physician approval, and in some cases, it was not possible to determine who had approved the recommendations. The consultant pharmacist acknowledged the lack of clear documentation and could not provide an alternative method to demonstrate physician participation in the review process. Additionally, the pharmacist failed to identify and address the use of as-needed (PRN) Ativan orders without a documented duration of use for three residents. For these residents, orders for Lorazepam (Ativan) were open-ended, lacking stop dates or documented rationales from physicians to extend the medication. The pharmacy reviews did not include recommendations regarding these PRN psychotropic medication orders, despite facility policies and pharmacy suggestions indicating the need for 30-day stop dates for such medications. The records for the affected residents showed ongoing administration of PRN Lorazepam without appropriate physician documentation or pharmacy intervention. Care plans indicated that the pharmacist was responsible for medication review, but there was no evidence of recommendations or follow-up regarding the continued use of these psychotropic medications. The deficiency was identified through review of records, pharmacy documentation, and interviews with the consultant pharmacist.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙