Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
E

Failure to Ensure Correct Negative Pressure Wound Device Settings for Pressure Ulcer Care

Desoto, Texas Survey Completed on 06-27-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide care and treatment consistent with professional standards for a resident with pressure ulcers, specifically regarding the use of a negative pressure wound device. The resident, an elderly female with diagnoses including heart failure, pyelonephritis, and dementia, was admitted with two stage IV pressure ulcers. Physician orders specified that the negative pressure wound device should be set to 125 mmHg. However, on two consecutive days, observations revealed the device was set at 150 mmHg instead of the ordered setting. The resident was unaware of the correct settings or when they were last changed. Interviews with nursing staff indicated a lack of clarity and oversight regarding the correct device settings. The nurse assigned to the resident was uncertain about the required settings and deferred to the treatment nurse, who then acknowledged the discrepancy and adjusted the device to the correct setting. The DON stated that it was the responsibility of the treatment nurse to ensure the settings matched physician orders and characterized incorrect settings as a medication error. Facility policy also required verification of physician orders and correct device settings, which was not followed in this instance.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙