Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0628
D

Failure to Provide Required Written Discharge Notice and Appeal Rights

Austin, Texas Survey Completed on 06-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide a written notice of discharge, including the reasons for the move and the right to appeal, to a resident and her representative at least 30 days prior to discharge. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and multiple medical diagnoses including hemiplegia, hemiparesis, dysphagia, and depression, was dependent on assistance for health literacy and functional cognition. Despite care plan requirements for communication and involvement in discharge planning, there was no documentation in the resident's progress notes or electronic health records indicating that a written discharge notice was given to the resident, her representative, or the Ombudsman. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of understanding and compliance with the regulatory requirement to provide a 30-day written discharge notice. The care manager (CM) and assistant director of nursing (ADON) both acknowledged that the notice was not provided, and the CM admitted to not knowing the requirement to notify the resident, representative, and Ombudsman in writing. The resident's representative reported learning about the discharge from a medical equipment provider rather than the facility and stated that neither she nor the resident received information about the right to appeal the discharge or the appeal process. Facility policy reviews confirmed the requirement for a 30-day written notice of discharge, including information on the reason for discharge, effective date, location, contact information for the Ombudsman, state survey agency, appeal rights, and resources for assistance. The policy also specified that the Ombudsman must be notified before discharge is initiated. Despite these policies, the facility did not provide the required notifications or documentation, resulting in a deficiency related to discharge planning and resident rights.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙