Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0655
D

Failure to Develop and Implement Person-Centered Baseline Care Plan Within 48 Hours of Admission

Webster, Texas Survey Completed on 06-11-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan that accurately reflected a resident's condition and provided person-centered care within 48 hours of admission. Upon review, the baseline care plan for a newly admitted male resident with multiple complex diagnoses, including hemiplegia, quadriplegia, morbid obesity, respiratory failure, and several wounds, was found to be incomplete and lacking specific instructions for effective care. The care plan only included general interventions for skin integrity, such as applying barrier cream and assisting with repositioning, without addressing the resident's specific wounds and other immediate needs. Record reviews revealed that the resident was admitted with several skin issues, including an abrasion to the abdomen and elbow, unstageable pressure ulcers on the foot and heel, and a fungal infection. Physician orders and treatment administration records indicated multiple wound care interventions and the use of pressure-reducing devices, but these were not fully incorporated into the baseline care plan. Interviews with staff confirmed that the care plan did not detail all necessary interventions, with the MDS nurse stating that a general statement to provide skin/wound care as ordered was considered sufficient, despite the presence of multiple wounds and specific physician orders. Further interviews with facility staff, including the DON and MDS nurse, revealed that the process for developing baseline care plans relied on minimal information and ongoing updates, rather than ensuring a comprehensive and individualized plan within the required 48-hour window. Facility policy required that baseline care plans be individualized and based on interdisciplinary assessments, but this was not followed in the resident's case, resulting in a care plan that did not accurately depict the resident's condition or provide clear guidance for staff.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙