Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Implement Care Plan Intervention for Specialized Call Light

Spring Branch, Texas Survey Completed on 06-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for a resident with multiple complex medical conditions, including muscle wasting, multiple sclerosis, and chronic pain syndrome. The resident was assessed as having moderate cognitive impairment and required substantial to maximal assistance with mobility and transfers. The care plan, initiated in March, specified the use of a pad-type call light as an intervention due to the resident's inability to use a traditional call light. Despite this documented intervention, observations and interviews revealed that the resident did not consistently have access to the pad-type call light. On multiple occasions, the resident struggled to use the traditional call light and often relied on a roommate or self-ambulation to seek staff assistance. Staff interviews indicated a lack of awareness regarding the resident's need for the specialized call light, and the care plan intervention was not consistently communicated or implemented. The facility's own policies require that care plans include measurable objectives and appropriate interventions to meet residents' needs, and that staff follow and update care plans as necessary. However, the failure to provide the pad-type call light as care planned resulted in the resident not receiving the necessary assistance to alert staff, as documented through direct observation, resident statements, and staff interviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙