Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Accurately Document and Implement Advance Directives

Spring Branch, Texas Survey Completed on 06-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident's advance directive wishes were accurately documented and implemented. There was a discrepancy in the resident's records: the face sheet and care plan listed the resident as full code, while a signed Out-of-Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (OOH-DNR) order was found in the miscellaneous documents section. Additionally, there were no DNR orders in the electronic health record, and the resident's orders reflected hospice care with contradictory information regarding code status. The resident had not signed any consents for hospice or the OOH-DNR, and the last care plan meeting did not include the resident. Interviews with facility staff, including the social worker, DON, and administrator, confirmed awareness of the discrepancies and acknowledged that the resident's wishes were not accurately reflected or updated in the records. The facility's policy requires that the medical record and plan of care reflect the resident's wishes and physician orders, but this was not followed in this case. The resident, who had moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision for daily activities, expressed during an interview that he would want CPR if needed, further highlighting the inconsistency between his stated wishes and the documented directives.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙