Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0552
D

Failure to Ensure Accurate Communication and Implementation of Code Status

Spring Branch, Texas Survey Completed on 06-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to ensure that a resident was fully informed of, and able to participate in, decisions regarding their code status and advance directives. Record review revealed a discrepancy in the resident's medical chart, with conflicting information between the face sheet, care plan, OOH-DNR document, and physician orders. The face sheet and care plan indicated full code status, while a signed OOH-DNR was present in the electronic health record, and hospice orders were also noted. No DNR order was found in the physician orders section, and contradictory information was present regarding code status and hospice care. Interviews with the resident, social worker, DON, and administrator confirmed the existence of these discrepancies. The resident expressed a desire to receive CPR, while the chart contained a DNR order signed by physicians, without the resident's consent or presence at the last care plan meeting. The social worker and DON acknowledged the inconsistencies, and the administrator stated that records should be updated at care plan meetings, with the social worker responsible for ensuring accuracy. Facility policy requires residents to be informed and able to exercise their rights, but this was not followed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙