Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0627
D

Failure to Permit Resident Return After Hospitalization

Dimmitt, Texas Survey Completed on 05-25-2025

Penalty

Fine: $73,7406 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to establish and follow a written policy regarding the return of a resident after hospitalization, resulting in the refusal to allow a resident to return following evaluation and treatment at a psychiatric hospital. The resident in question was an elderly male with severe cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, schizoaffective disorder, and a history of behavioral disturbances, including aggression and elopement risk. Documentation showed that the resident required moderate to total assistance with daily activities and had a care plan addressing his behavioral and safety needs. Progress notes detailed multiple incidents of aggressive and combative behavior by the resident towards staff and other residents, including physical altercations and attempts to elope. These behaviors led to the resident being transferred to a psychiatric hospital for further evaluation and treatment. While the resident was hospitalized, facility leadership, including corporate staff, decided not to permit the resident's return, citing concerns for the safety of other residents and staff. This decision was communicated to the ombudsman and the resident's family, and the resident's personal belongings were removed from his room, which was reassigned to another individual. The facility's own policy stated that residents should be permitted to return following hospitalization, and that not allowing a resident to return constitutes a discharge, requiring appropriate notice to the resident and their representative. However, the facility did not follow this policy, as the resident was not allowed to return and the required discharge procedures were not followed. Interviews with staff, family, and the ombudsman confirmed that the decision not to readmit the resident was made at the corporate level, and that the facility was aware this action could be considered an improper discharge or "dumping."

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙