Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0693
D

Lack of Physician Order for Abdominal Binder Used to Secure G-Tube

Crowley, Texas Survey Completed on 06-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency was identified when a resident with severe cognitive impairment and dependent on a gastrostomy tube (g-tube) for nutrition did not have a physician's order for an abdominal binder that was being used to secure and protect the g-tube. The resident had a history of pulling out her g-tube during care, as documented in progress notes and confirmed by staff interviews. The abdominal binder was implemented to prevent further incidents of the resident pulling out her g-tube, and staff reported that no further incidents occurred after its use. Despite the use of the abdominal binder as an intervention, review of the resident's medical records and physician orders revealed that there was no physician's order for the binder. The Director of Nursing stated that an order was not required because the binder was considered protective rather than a treatment, while the physician indicated that an order should have been in place. The facility's policy required that enteral nutrition and related interventions be provided as ordered, but the lack of a physician's order for the abdominal binder constituted a failure to ensure appropriate treatment and services for the resident receiving enteral feeding.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙