Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
E

Failure to Accurately Reflect Resident Preferences and Needs in Care Plans

Sherman, Texas Survey Completed on 06-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that comprehensive care plans accurately reflected the needs and preferences of three residents, as identified through observation, interviews, and record review. One resident, a cognitively intact female with multiple diagnoses including diabetes, malnutrition, depression, and metabolic encephalopathy, expressed a clear preference for only female staff to provide her personal and incontinent care. Despite communicating this preference to several staff members, her care plan did not document this need, and some staff were unaware of her wishes, resulting in her being pressured to accept care from male staff during a weekend. Another resident, a female with severe cognitive impairment and a diagnosis of dementia and depression, preferred only female aides except for one specific male CNA. Both the resident and her family had to repeatedly inform staff of this preference when male aides were assigned to her, as it was not reflected in her care plan. While some staff were aware of her wishes through verbal communication, others were not, and the care plan did not specify her preference or the exception for the one male CNA. A third resident, a male with severe hearing impairment, moderately impaired vision, and aphasia following a stroke, had no documentation in his care plan regarding his communication or sensory deficits. Staff interviews revealed inconsistent awareness of his needs, with some staff noting his hearing and vision issues and others unsure. The responsible party also confirmed the resident's significant impairments, but these were not addressed in the care plan, leaving staff without clear guidance on how to communicate with or care for him.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙