Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Care Plan Dialysis for Resident with End Stage Renal Disease

Luling, Texas Survey Completed on 08-28-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for a resident with end stage renal disease who was receiving dialysis three times a week at an external dialysis center. Despite the resident's medical history, which included diagnoses such as end stage renal disease, depression, dementia, muscle wasting, vitamin D deficiency, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension, the care plan did not address the dialysis treatment as required. The resident's annual MDS assessment indicated the need for dialysis, but this was not reflected in the care plan dated after the assessment. Interviews with nursing staff revealed that while routine preparations and checks were performed before the resident was transported for dialysis, these actions were based on the nurse's experience rather than guidance from a documented care plan. The MDS nurse acknowledged that the dialysis treatment should have been included in the care plan and attributed the omission to unintentional negligence. The facility's policy requires that all active problems identified in the comprehensive assessment be incorporated into the care plan, but this was not followed in the case of the resident's dialysis treatment.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙