Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0623
D

Failure to Provide Written Discharge Notice Upon Resident Transfer to Police Custody

Georgetown, Texas Survey Completed on 04-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide written notification of discharge to a resident and the resident's representative when the resident was transferred into police custody. The resident, who had a history of diabetes, chronic pain, and repeated falls, was cognitively intact as indicated by a BIMS score of 15. On the day of the incident, law enforcement arrived at the facility to take the resident into custody, and the Director of Nursing (DON) documented that all belongings and medical information were sent with the resident. However, there was no evidence that a written discharge notice was provided to the resident or their representative at the time of transfer. Interviews with facility staff, including the Social Worker, Administrator, and DON, revealed that the decision to discharge the resident was made based on information from law enforcement that the resident would remain in custody until trial. The staff acknowledged that the usual 30-day written notice for facility-initiated discharges was not given, and instead, verbal notifications and voicemails were left for the resident's Power of Attorney (POA) and the ombudsman. The facility also did not provide written documentation of the reasons for discharge in a language and manner understandable to the resident and their representative. Further review indicated that the facility's policies require written notice of discharge or transfer, including in emergency situations, and that such notices should be provided to the resident, their representative, and the ombudsman. Despite these policies, the facility did not issue the required written notice when the resident was taken into police custody and subsequently discharged. The ombudsman confirmed that the resident had previously appealed a discharge and won, and expressed that the resident should have been accepted back after the arrest and hospital stay, but the facility refused readmission based on its policy regarding registered sex offenders.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙