Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Incorrect Coding of MDS Discharge Assessment

Kemp, Texas Survey Completed on 07-02-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that assessments accurately reflected a resident's status for one resident reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. Specifically, the discharge MDS assessment for a male resident with chronic combined heart failure was incorrectly coded as 'return not anticipated' instead of 'return anticipated.' The resident was readmitted to the facility from the hospital within the required timeframe, which should have prompted a 'return anticipated' discharge assessment rather than a new admission assessment. The MDS Coordinator, who was responsible for completing the assessment, acknowledged after reviewing the resident's records that the incorrect assessment type was selected and that it should have been modified to reflect the correct status. Interviews with facility staff, including the MDS Coordinator, Regional Reimbursement Nurse, and Administrator, confirmed that the correct assessment was not completed and that there was no specific policy or procedure in place regarding MDS assessment accuracy, with staff relying on the RAI manual for guidance. The error was identified through record review and staff interviews, and it was noted that the correct assessment is important for ensuring continuity of care and an accurate plan of care upon the resident's return.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙