Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Develop and Implement Care Plan for Resident's Wandering Behavior

El Paso, Texas Survey Completed on 06-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that addressed a resident's history of wandering. Record reviews showed that although the resident was listed as a wanderer on the facility's list, there was no corresponding focus, goal, or intervention for wandering in the resident's care plan. The resident had a severely impaired cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 3, and was diagnosed with altered mental status and UTI. However, the clinical risk assessment and MDS did not code for wandering, and the care plan did not reflect this behavior. Interviews with the DON, MDS, and Administrator confirmed that the resident's wandering behavior should have been care planned, and that it was the responsibility of the MDS department to ensure care plans were accurate and complete. The lack of a care plan for wandering was acknowledged as an oversight, with staff stating that care plans are necessary to inform staff of resident needs and to provide appropriate care. The facility's policy requires the interdisciplinary team to develop a comprehensive care plan for each resident, but this was not followed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙