Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
E

Failure to Provide Privacy Covers for Urinary Catheter Bags

Angleton, Texas Survey Completed on 08-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide privacy covers for urinary catheter bags for two residents, both of whom had indwelling catheters due to neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. One resident, a male with paraplegia and intact cognition, was observed without a privacy cover on his catheter bag while staff stated that covers would be used when available. The other resident, a female with cerebral palsy and severe cognitive impairment, was also observed multiple times in common areas without a privacy cover on her catheter bag, despite physician orders specifying that a privacy bag should be in place at all times. Staff interviews confirmed that privacy covers were expected to be used, and that their absence was considered a dignity and privacy issue. Further observations revealed that privacy covers were sometimes found in residents' rooms but not in use, and staff indicated that covers could be misplaced, soiled, or removed by residents themselves. The Director of Nursing and other staff acknowledged the importance of privacy covers for maintaining resident dignity, but the facility did not have a policy addressing the use of privacy covers for urinary catheters. The lack of consistent use of privacy covers resulted in a failure to treat residents with respect and dignity, and did not promote the maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙