Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0756
E

Failure to Identify and Report Drug Regimen Irregularities by Consultant Pharmacist

Beaumont, Texas Survey Completed on 08-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the consultant pharmacist accurately identified and reported drug regimen irregularities for two residents who were prescribed antihypertensive medications with specific hold parameters. For one resident with end stage renal disease and hypertension, Coreg was ordered with instructions to hold the medication if systolic blood pressure (SBP) was less than 100, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) less than 60, or heart rate (HR) less than 60. Medication administration records (MARs) showed that the medication was held frequently throughout July and August due to low blood pressure or heart rate, but there was no documentation that the physician was notified of these repeated holds, nor were any recommendations made by the pharmacy consultant during monthly reviews. A second resident with hypertensive heart disease and heart failure was prescribed metoprolol succinate ER with similar hold parameters. The MARs indicated that this medication was also held multiple times when vital signs were outside the prescribed range. Again, the pharmacy consultant's monthly review did not identify or report these frequent holds as irregularities, and no recommendations were documented. Interviews with the DON and nursing staff confirmed that the medications were held according to parameters, but there was a lack of consistent physician notification and documentation. The pharmacy consultant acknowledged being unaware of the frequency with which these medications were held and stated that the review process would be modified. The administrator confirmed that there was no policy in place regarding the pharmacy consultant's responsibilities in this area.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙