Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
J

Failure to Prevent Resident Elopement Due to Inadequate Supervision and Monitoring

San Antonio, Texas Survey Completed on 05-30-2025

Penalty

Fine: $25,500
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents, specifically failing to prevent an elopement by a resident with severe cognitive impairment. The resident, a male with unspecified dementia and no behavioral disturbances noted on his MDS, was admitted for respite care and was independent with mobility. Documentation revealed gaps in the resident's baseline care plan, with several sections left blank, including those related to mood, behavior, and care planning. There was no physician order for monitoring the resident, and the admission documentation did not indicate any assessment or plan for wandering risk. On the day of the incident, the resident was observed to have increased wandering behavior. Staff interviews and record reviews confirmed that the resident was able to leave the facility undetected and was found outside near an access road by the expressway. The front door was observed to be unlocked and unattended at the time, and although staff stated that door alarms were in place, the monitoring of the front entrance was inconsistent. Multiple staff members recalled the event, noting that the receptionist was sometimes away from the desk, and that the resident was able to exit quickly. There was no incident report completed regarding the resident's wandering or elopement, and the family was notified of the attempt to leave by the hospice company, not the facility. Facility policies required identification and supervision of residents at risk for unsafe wandering, as well as completion of incident reports and notification of appropriate parties in the event of an elopement. However, these procedures were not followed in this case. The lack of a completed care plan, insufficient monitoring of exit doors, and failure to document and report the incident contributed to the deficiency. Staff interviews revealed inconsistent understanding and implementation of monitoring responsibilities, and the facility did not have effective measures in place to prevent the resident's elopement.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙