Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Failure to Accurately Document Resident Weights in Medical Record

Floresville, Texas Survey Completed on 06-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for a resident, specifically by not documenting the resident's weights in the electronic medical record (EMR) for four out of five weeks during the review period. Although the facility's policy required new admissions to be weighed weekly for the first four weeks and for weights to be recorded in the EMR, the resident's weights were missing from the EMR for the weeks in question. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that weights were sometimes documented on paper and not entered into the EMR, citing being short-staffed as a reason for the omission. The administrator confirmed that the facility's weight monitoring reports relied on data entered into the EMR, and missing entries could affect the facility's ability to detect weight changes. The resident involved was an older male with a history of cerebral infarction, muscle wasting, atrophy, and lack of coordination. He was at moderate risk for malnutrition, obese, and at risk for weight changes due to edema and diuretic use. The resident's progress notes and nutritional therapy evaluation did not contain alternative documentation of weights for the missing weeks. Handwritten records were available but not consistently dated or entered into the EMR as required by facility policy. This incomplete documentation was identified through observation, interviews, and record reviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙