Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0804
E

Deficient Food Palatability, Temperature, and Recipe Adherence

Savoy, Texas Survey Completed on 05-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for one of three meals observed during a survey. During the lunch meal, food temperatures were recorded as being below recommended levels, with the regular chicken parmesan measured at 87°F and the puree chicken parmesan at 109°F, both of which are below the standard for hot food service. Observations and interviews revealed that the green beans were bland and cool, and the chicken parmesan was described as warm but not hot by both the Dietary Manager and surveyors. Residents interviewed expressed dissatisfaction with the food, noting issues such as tough meat, unappetizing appearance, and insufficient quantity. Further investigation found that the facility did not follow the prescribed puree recipe for the lunch meal. The cook was observed adding water and food thickener to green beans instead of using the recommended liquids such as broth, juice, milk, gravy, or sauce, as specified in the recipe book. The cook admitted to not consulting the recipe book prior to preparing the meal and stated that he relied on his own experience. The Dietary Manager was unaware that staff were not following the recipe book and confirmed that the last in-service training on following the menu was completed a month prior. Interviews with the Dietary Manager and Administrator indicated a lack of oversight and communication regarding adherence to recipes and food preparation standards. The Dietary Manager stated he was responsible for ensuring staff followed the recipe book but was not informed of deviations. The Administrator, who oversees the Dietary Manager, was also unaware of staff not following recipes and was unsure about the completion of in-service training. Both acknowledged the importance of providing palatable and appetizing food but did not identify recent complaints or issues prior to the survey findings.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙