Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
E

Failure to Include Hospice Services in Resident Care Plans

Munday, Texas Survey Completed on 06-26-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans for three residents who were receiving hospice services. Record reviews revealed that these residents had significant medical conditions, including various forms of dementia, heart failure, and schizoaffective disorder, and had been admitted to hospice care as ordered by their physicians. Despite these admissions, their care plans did not include focus areas or interventions related to hospice services, and in some cases, progress notes did not reflect hospice involvement. For one resident, the care plan was last reviewed after the initiation of hospice services but did not address hospice care needs. Another resident's care plan included interventions for mood problems and overall decline but did not specifically address the terminal diagnosis or hospice admission, even though physician orders and MDS assessments indicated hospice care was in place. The third resident's care plan, initiated prior to hospice admission, was not updated to reflect the new hospice status, despite documentation in progress notes and physician orders confirming hospice enrollment. Interviews with facility leadership, including the DON and Administrator, confirmed that hospice services should have been included in the care plans and that care plan meetings with hospice were standard practice. The DON acknowledged the omission and was unaware of how these residents were missed. The facility's own policy requires comprehensive, person-centered care plans with measurable objectives and timetables, developed by the interdisciplinary team and revised as residents' conditions change, which was not followed in these cases.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙