Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0658
D

Failure to Address and Communicate Significant Weight Variances

Barrigada, GU Survey Completed on 08-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure staff adhered to professional standards regarding the monitoring and response to significant weight variances for a resident who was re-admitted after hospitalization with diagnoses including recurrent urinary tract infection and a stage IV decubitus ulcer. The resident experienced notable fluctuations in weight over a short period, including a 4% weight loss in two weeks and an 8% weight gain in two days. Despite these changes, there was no documentation that the weight variances were addressed by nursing staff or communicated to the Registered Dietician (RD), nor were they discussed in the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) meetings during the relevant period. Interviews with staff revealed that while there was an expectation to re-weigh residents and notify the RD in cases of significant weight discrepancies, these actions were not documented or carried out for this resident. The RD confirmed she was not informed of the weight changes and emphasized the importance of being notified to review and adjust nutritional interventions, especially for residents receiving tube feeding. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility did not have a specific weight policy and instead followed the Lippincott procedure, which requires assessment and notification of practitioners for significant weight changes, but this protocol was not followed in this instance.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙