Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0627
D

Resident Not Included in Discharge Planning Process

Los Angeles, California Survey Completed on 07-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident was included in the discharge planning process, as required by policy. Review of the resident's medical record revealed that, although the resident had a complex medical history including end stage renal disease on hemodialysis, peripheral artery disease, and multiple amputations, there was no documentation of any conversation with the resident regarding discharge planning until several days after admission. The first documented interaction between the discharge planner and the resident occurred only after four prior care management progress notes had been completed, none of which indicated the resident's involvement in the discharge planning process. During an interview, the Director of Case Management and Social Services confirmed that it is important for discharge planners to meet with residents within one to two days of admission to ensure their preferences are incorporated into the discharge plan. The facility's policy also requires care management staff to engage the patient or their representative in the discharge planning process and to consider their preferences. The lack of early engagement with the resident meant that the resident's needs and preferences may not have been fully considered during the initial stages of discharge planning.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙